Identify architecturally significant design elements
Refine the key abstractions into concrete design elements (such as classes and subsystems) and
provide at least a name and brief description for each. Add them to the Design.
|
Refine architectural mechanisms
Refine each prioritized architectural mechanism into a design state (see Concept: Architectural Mechanism).
Review the objectives of the current iteration to identify which mechanisms actually need to be delivered in software.
Work with the Developer to those refine mechanisms into an implementation state.
|
Map the software to the hardware
Map the architecturally significant design elements to the target deployment environment. Work with hardware and network
specialists to ensure that the hardware is sufficient to meet the needs of the system; and that any new hardware is
available in time. |
Define development architecture and test architecture
Ensure that the development and test architectures are defined. Note any architecturally significant differences
between these environments and work with the team to devise strategies to mitigate any risks these may introduce.
|
Update the architecture
Validate the architecture
Make sure that the architecture supports the requirements and the needs of the team.
Development work should be performed to produce a Build that shows that the
software architecture is viable. This should provide the definitive basis for validating the suitability of the
architecture. As the software should be developed iteratively, more than one increment of the build may be
required to prove the architecture. During the early stages of the project it may be acceptable for the
software to have a incomplete or prototypical feel, as it will be primarily concerned with baselining the
architecture to provide a stable foundation for the remaining development work.
|
Communicate decisions
Ensure that those who need to act upon the architectural work understand it and are able to work with
it. Make sure that the description of the architecture clearly conveys not only the solution but also the
motivation and objectives related to the decisions that have been made in shaping the architecture. This will make
it easier for others to understand the architecture and to adapt it over time.
|
|